Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Worldovision
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:59, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Miss Worldovision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable web-based beauty pageant. Unable to find any third party sources that meet the requirements of WP:WEB to verify the article's claim of being the most publicized web beauty contest in the world. VQuakr (talk) 03:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree subject is non notable. Mostly self-referenced, stub quality article. Non encyclopedic tone. Needs serious work and references to come near a keep. "tk" websites listed on Wikipedia article as "twice as likely" to be "phishing or spam;" origin: New Zealand (free internet registrations). Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 06:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.