Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solodev (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger One ping only 23:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Solodev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not G4-ing because one CSD has already been declined, and this seems to be a good-faith creation by a new editor, but nothing has changed since the last AfD ten months ago. The company does not meet WP:CORP. The small amount of coverage that exists is either trivial mentions or puff pieces in local business columns. – Joe (talk) 07:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 07:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 07:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 07:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete agreed, no improvement since the last AfD; this company still does not meet our inclusion requirements. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.