Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advantage Lithium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Advantage Lithium

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Advantage Lithium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. A search returns trade listings and no WP:SIGCOV before generic articles on the advantages of lithium batteries. PROD contested by a WP:SPA IP. Cabayi (talk) 09:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 09:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom, for failing WP:NCORP. Ifnord (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. This is a puff piece more than anything.TH1980 (talk) 03:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete I read NCORP above, and it fails. HPlilly (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.