Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katarzyna Javaheri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Katarzyna Javaheri

Katarzyna Javaheri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. I couldn't find any indication that the subject meets WP:PROF or the WP:GNG at this time, though I'd be happy to be proved wrong. – Joe (talk) 01:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 01:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Article has a claim for notability for expertise in a scholarly area, but her 6 books listed in WorldCat each have only single-digit holdings (actually the maximum is just 2), so TOOSOON seems to be a fitting description. Agricola44 (talk) 21:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC).
• Delete does not meet the notability requirements for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
• Delete Too few sources, with added language barriers. Not enough here to meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.