Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slush Puppie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (Nomination withdrawn). No arguments have been made for deletion except by the nominator, who withdrew the nomination. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 08:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Slush Puppie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Quick GNews search turned up the following significant news stories:
- "Frozen in time: Slush Puppie still hot after 27 years, Cincinnati Enquirer, January 18, 1998.
- "With marketing, new flavors, Slush Puppies do hot business", Associated Press in The Vindicator, January 26, 1998.
- "Cadbury Buys Slush Puppie", BBC News, 21 December 2000.
- "Drink Mogul Soaks Up Rural Life ; A Conservation Deal Lets Will Radcliff Of Slush Puppie Fame Stay On His Beloved Fly'n R Ranch." Orlando Sentinel, December 6, 2004 (pay wall).
- Keep Looks like it has wp:notability but needs an editor to put those sources in. North8000 (talk) 02:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I pasted in Arxiloxos's listing into the article as a "further reading" section. North8000 (talk) 02:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable product by WP:N, because of sources added.Borock (talk) 03:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn - (e/c) It looks like this one was lazy on my part, thanks for the quick sourcing. If no-one objects I'd like to withdraw this nomination. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.